Biomechanical Analysis of Internal Fixation Methods for Distal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27390567.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1558944715627211 and PMC identifier 4920526.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The biomechanical performance of distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) fixation techniques in response to cyclic and load-to-failure bending loads is generally unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of 4 commonly used techniques for DIP arthrodesis. Phalanges were fixed by one of the following techniques: (1) 2 parallel Kirschner wires (K-wires), (2) 1 longitudinal K-wire and 1 oblique K-wire, (3) an Acutrak® 2 Micro headless compression screw, or (4) 90-90 wiring. The phalanges were loaded in cantilever bending on the palmar side of the phalange for 3000 cycles, then loaded-to-failure. The 90-90 wiring was significantly worse than the other 3 methods in 9 of 10 parameters analyzed. Both K-wire methods and the screw produced similar results in nearly all parameters. Given the lack of difference in biomechanical performance between K-wires and compression screws, consideration should be given to other factors such as cost and complication profiles when choosing an implant for DIPJ fusion.
Anatomy
- hand