What Should Be the Content and Frequency of Performing a Medical Evaluation to Determine Fitness to Wear a Respirator?
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27414013.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000815.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the standard of care among occupational medicine practioners for determining medical fitness to wear a respirator. A 15-item email/telephone survey was conducted of members of the Michigan Occupational and Environmental Medical Association. Sixty-seven percent of occupational medicine practioners who responded performed respirator evaluations; 75% did more than just the required Occupational Safety Health Administration questionnaire. Cardiovascular and respiratory symptoms and problems wearing a respirator (87% to 95%) were the most common reasons for additional testing and denying medical clearance (58% to 82%). Sixty percent of practioners required workers to have an annual evaluation. The frequency of medical evaluation, which specific tests were performed, and the criteria used to determine fitness to wear a respirator varied markedly between practioners. Further research is needed to determine whether the widespread variation is a sign of too little or too much testing by different practioners.
Medical subject headings
- Occupational Medicine
- Respiratory Protective Devices
- Work Capacity Evaluation