Management of Patients With NSTE-ACS: A Comparison of the Recent AHA/ACC and ESC Guidelines.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27417010.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.599.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease worldwide. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology periodically release practice guidelines to guide clinicians in the management of NSTE-ACS, most recently in in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The present review compares and contrasts the 2 guidelines, with a focus on the strength of recommendation and level of evidence in the approach to initial presentation and diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, risk assessment, treatments, and systems of care. Important differences include the use of a rapid rule-out protocol with high-sensitivity troponin assays, a preference for prasugrel/ticagrelor and fondaparinux for anticoagulation therapy, and a preference for radial arterial access in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines compared with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. We also highlight the similarities and differences in the guidelines for special patient populations and suggest areas of further study.
Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Anticoagulants
- Cardiology
- Electrocardiography
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Societies, Medical