The evidence-practice gap in specialist mental healthcare: systematic review and meta-analysis of guideline implementation studies.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27445353.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179093.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines are not easily implemented, leading to a gap between research synthesis and their use in routine care. To summarise the evidence relating to the impact of guideline implementation on provider performance and patient outcomes in mental healthcare settings, and to explore the performance of different strategies for guideline implementation. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and before-and-after studies comparing guideline implementation strategies v. usual care, and different guideline implementation strategies, in patients with severe mental illness. In total, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies did not show a consistent positive effect of guideline implementation on provider performance, but a more consistent small to modest positive effect on patient outcomes. Guideline implementation does not seem to have an impact on provider performance, nonetheless it may influence patient outcomes positively.
Medical subject headings
- Guideline Adherence
- Mental Disorders
- Mental Health Services
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
- Professional Practice Gaps