Individualized Pazopanib Dosing: A Prospective Feasibility Study in Cancer Patients.

Verheijen, Remy B; Bins, Sander; Mathijssen, Ron H J; Lolkema, Martijn P; van Doorn, Leni; Schellens, Jan H M; Beijnen, Jos H; Langenberg, Marlies H G et al. · Clin Cancer Res · 2016

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma. Retrospective analyses have shown that an increased median progression-free survival and tumor shrinkage appear in patients with higher plasma trough levels (C<sub>min</sub>). Therefore, patients with low C<sub>min</sub> might benefit from pharmacokinetically guided individualized dosing. We conducted a prospective multicenter trial in 30 patients with advanced solid tumors. Pazopanib C<sub>min</sub> was measured weekly by LC-MS/MS. At weeks 3, 5, and 7, the pazopanib dose was increased if the measured C<sub>min</sub> was <20 mg/L and toxicity was <grade 3. In total, 17 patients had at least one C<sub>min</sub> <20 mg/L at weeks 3, 5, and 7. Of these, 10 were successfully treated with a pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation, leading to daily dosages ranging from 1,000 to 1,800 mg. C<sub>min</sub> in these patients increased significantly from 13.2 (38.0%) mg/L [mean (CV%)] to 22.9 mg/L (44.9%). Thirteen patients had all C<sub>min</sub> levels ≥20.0 mg/L. Of these, 9 patients with a high C<sub>min</sub> of 51.3 mg/L (45.1%) experienced ≥grade 3 toxicity and subsequently required a dose reduction to 600 or 400 mg daily, yet in these patients, C<sub>min</sub> remained above the threshold at 28.2 mg/L (25.3%). A pharmacokinetically guided individualized dosing algorithm was successfully applied and evaluated. The dosing algorithm led to patients being treated at dosages ranging from 400 to 1,800 mg daily. Further studies are needed to show a benefit of individualized dosing on clinical outcomes, such as progression-free survival. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5738-46. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Ornstein and Rini, p. 5626.

Medical subject headings