Impact of organ shape variations on margin concepts for cervix cancer ART.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27528119.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Target and organ movement motivate adaptive radiotherapy for cervix cancer patients. We investigated the dosimetric impact of margin concepts with different levels of complexity on both organ at risk (OAR) sparing and PTV coverage. Weekly CT and daily CBCT scans were delineated for 10 patients. The dosimetric impact of organ shape variations were evaluated for four (isotropic) margin concepts: two static PTVs (PTV<sub>6mm</sub> and PTV<sub>15mm</sub>), a PTV based on ITV of the planning CT and CBCTs of the first treatment week (PTV<sub>ART ITV</sub>) and an adaptive PTV based on a library approach (PTV<sub>ART Library</sub>). Using static concepts, OAR doses increased with large margins, while smaller margins compromised target coverage. ART PTVs resulted in comparable target coverage and better sparing of bladder (V40Gy: 15% and 7% less), rectum (V40Gy: 18 and 6cc less) and bowel (V40Gy: 106 and 15cc less) compared to PTV<sub>15mm</sub>. Target coverage evaluation showed that for elective fields a static 5mm margin sufficed. PTV<sub>ART Library</sub> achieved the best dosimetric results. However when weighing clinical benefit against workload, ITV margins based on repetitive movement evaluation during the first week also provide improvements over static margin concepts.
Medical subject headings
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms