The prognostic and predictive value of sstr<sub>2</sub>-immunohistochemistry and sstr<sub>2</sub>-targeted imaging in neuroendocrine tumors.

Brunner, Philippe; Jörg, Ann-Catherine; Glatz, Katharina; Bubendorf, Lukas; Radojewski, Piotr; Umlauft, Maria; Marincek, Nicolas; Spanjol, Petar-Marko et al. · Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging · 2017

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Our aim was to assess the prognostic and predictive value of somatostatin receptor 2 (sstr<sub>2</sub>) in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We established a tissue microarray and imaging database from NET patients that received sstr<sub>2</sub>-targeted radiopeptide therapy with yttrium-90-DOTATOC, lutetium-177-DOTATOC or alternative treatment. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic and predictive markers for overall survival, including sstr<sub>2</sub>-imaging and sstr<sub>2</sub>-immunohistochemistry. We included a total of 279 patients. In these patients, sstr<sub>2</sub>-immunohistochemistry was an independent prognostic marker for overall survival (HR: 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.67 - 0.99, n = 279, p = 0.037). In DOTATOC patients, sstr<sub>2</sub>-expression on immunohistochemistry correlated with tumor uptake on sstr<sub>2</sub>-imaging (n = 170, p < 0.001); however, sstr<sub>2</sub>-imaging showed a higher prognostic accuracy (positive predictive value: +27 %, 95 % CI: 3 - 56 %, p = 0.025). Sstr<sub>2</sub>-expression did not predict a benefit of DOTATOC over alternative treatment (p = 0.93). Our results suggest sstr<sub>2</sub> as an independent prognostic marker in NETs. Sstr<sub>2</sub>-immunohistochemistry correlates with sstr<sub>2</sub>-imaging; however, sstr<sub>2</sub>-imaging is more accurate for determining the individual prognosis.

Medical subject headings