Measured acoustic intensities for clinical diagnostic ultrasound transducers and correlation with thermal index.

Retz, K; Kotopoulis, S; Kiserud, T; Matre, K; Eide, G E; Sande, R · Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol · 2017

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

To investigate if the thermal index for bone (TIB) displayed on screen is an adequate predictor for the derated spatial-peak temporal-average (I<sub>SPTA</sub><sub>.3</sub> ) and spatial-peak pulse-average (I<sub>SPPA</sub><sub>.3</sub> ) acoustic intensities in a selection of clinical diagnostic ultrasound machines and transducers. We calibrated five clinical diagnostic ultrasound scanners and 10 transducers, using two-dimensional grayscale, color Doppler and pulsed-wave Doppler, both close to and far from the transducer, with a TIB between 0.1 and 4.0, recording 103 unique measurements. Acoustic measurements were performed in a bespoke three-axis computer-controlled scanning tank, using a 200-μm-diameter calibrated needle hydrophone. There was significant but poor correlation between the acoustic intensities and the on-screen TIB. At a TIB of 0.1, the I<sub>SPTA</sub><sub>.3</sub> range was 0.51-50.49 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> and the I<sub>SPPA</sub><sub>.3</sub> range was 0.01-207.29 W/cm<sup>2</sup> . At a TIB of 1.1, the I<sub>SPTA</sub><sub>.3</sub> range was 19.02-309.44 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> and the I<sub>SPPA</sub><sub>.3</sub> range was 3.87-51.89 W/cm<sup>2</sup> . TIB is a poor predictor for I<sub>SPTA</sub><sub>.3</sub> and I<sub>SPPA</sub><sub>.3</sub> and for the potential bioeffects of clinical diagnostic ultrasound scanners. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Medical subject headings