Opposing Effects of Fasting Metabolism on Tissue Tolerance in Bacterial and Viral Inflammation.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27610573.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.026 and PMC identifier 5555589.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Acute infections are associated with a set of stereotypic behavioral responses, including anorexia, lethargy, and social withdrawal. Although these so-called sickness behaviors are the most common and familiar symptoms of infections, their roles in host defense are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of anorexia in models of bacterial and viral infections. We found that anorexia was protective while nutritional supplementation was detrimental in bacterial sepsis. Furthermore, glucose was necessary and sufficient for these effects. In contrast, nutritional supplementation protected against mortality from influenza infection and viral sepsis, whereas blocking glucose utilization was lethal. In both bacterial and viral models, these effects were largely independent of pathogen load and magnitude of inflammation. Instead, we identify opposing metabolic requirements tied to cellular stress adaptations critical for tolerance of differential inflammatory states. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Medical subject headings
- Disease Management
- Fasting
- Glucose
- Illness Behavior
- Influenza, Human
- Listeriosis
- Nutritional Support