Parametric Methods for Dynamic <sup>11</sup>C-Phenytoin PET Studies.

Mansor, Syahir; Yaqub, Maqsood; Boellaard, Ronald; Froklage, Femke E; de Vries, Anke; Bakker, Esther D M; Voskuyl, Rob A; Eriksson, Jonas et al. · J Nucl Med · 2017

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

In this study, the performance of various methods for generating quantitative parametric images of dynamic <sup>11</sup>C-phenytoin PET studies was evaluated. <b>Methods:</b> Double-baseline 60-min dynamic <sup>11</sup>C-phenytoin PET studies, including online arterial sampling, were acquired for 6 healthy subjects. Parametric images were generated using Logan plot analysis, a basis function method, and spectral analysis. Parametric distribution volume (V<sub>T</sub>) and influx rate (<i>K</i><sub>1</sub>) were compared with those obtained from nonlinear regression analysis of time-activity curves. In addition, global and regional test-retest (TRT) variability was determined for parametric <i>K</i><sub>1</sub> and V<sub>T</sub> values. <b>Results:</b> Biases in V<sub>T</sub> observed with all parametric methods were less than 5%. For <i>K</i><sub>1</sub>, spectral analysis showed a negative bias of 16%. The mean TRT variabilities of V<sub>T</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>1</sub> were less than 10% for all methods. Shortening the scan duration to 45 min provided similar V<sub>T</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>1</sub> with comparable TRT performance compared with 60-min data. <b>Conclusion:</b> Among the various parametric methods tested, the basis function method provided parametric V<sub>T</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>1</sub> values with the least bias compared with nonlinear regression data and showed TRT variabilities lower than 5%, also for smaller volume-of-interest sizes (i.e., higher noise levels) and shorter scan duration.

Medical subject headings