Correlates of Perceived Ankle Instability in Healthy Individuals Aged 8 to 101 Years.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27666159.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.474.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To provide reference data for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and to investigate the prevalence and correlates of perceived ankle instability in a large healthy population. Cross-sectional observational study. University laboratory. Self-reported healthy individuals (N=900; age range, 8-101y, stratified by age and sex) from the 1000 Norms Project. Not applicable. Participants completed the CAIT (age range, 18-101y) or CAIT-Youth (age range, 8-17y). Sociodemographic factors, anthropometric measures, hypermobility, foot alignment, toes strength, lower limb alignment, and ankle strength and range of motion were analyzed. Of the 900 individuals aged 8 to 101 years, 203 (23%) had bilateral and 73 (8%) had unilateral perceived ankle instability. The odds of bilateral ankle instability were 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.8; P<.001) times higher for female individuals, decreased by 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%; P=.001) for each year of increasing age, increased by 3% (95% CI, 0%-6%; P=.041) for each degree of ankle dorsiflexion tightness, and increased by 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%, P<.001) for each centimeter of increased waist circumference. Perceived ankle instability was common, with almost a quarter of the sample reporting bilateral instability. Female sex, younger age, increased abdominal adiposity, and decreased ankle dorsiflexion range of motion were independently associated with perceived ankle instability.
Medical subject headings
- Ankle Joint
- Joint Instability
- Perception
Anatomy
- ankle