How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits?
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27741248.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005150 and PMC identifier 5065234.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Neural circuits reliably encode and transmit signals despite the presence of noise at multiple stages of processing. The efficient coding hypothesis, a guiding principle in computational neuroscience, suggests that a neuron or population of neurons allocates its limited range of responses as efficiently as possible to best encode inputs while mitigating the effects of noise. Previous work on this question relies on specific assumptions about where noise enters a circuit, limiting the generality of the resulting conclusions. Here we systematically investigate how noise introduced at different stages of neural processing impacts optimal coding strategies. Using simulations and a flexible analytical approach, we show how these strategies depend on the strength of each noise source, revealing under what conditions the different noise sources have competing or complementary effects. We draw two primary conclusions: (1) differences in encoding strategies between sensory systems-or even adaptational changes in encoding properties within a given system-may be produced by changes in the structure or location of neural noise, and (2) characterization of both circuit nonlinearities as well as noise are necessary to evaluate whether a circuit is performing efficiently.
Medical subject headings
- Information Storage and Retrieval
- Models, Neurological
- Models, Statistical
- Nerve Net
- Sensory Receptor Cells
- Synaptic Transmission