A PET/MRI study towards finding the optimal [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluciclovine PET protocol for detection and characterisation of primary prostate cancer.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27817158.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-016-3562-7.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
[<sup>18</sup>F]Fluciclovine PET imaging shows promise for the assessment of prostate cancer. The purpose of this PET/MRI study is to optimise the PET imaging protocol for detection and characterisation of primary prostate cancer, by quantitative evaluation of the dynamic uptake of [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluciclovine in cancerous and benign tissue. Patients diagnosed with high-risk primary prostate cancer underwent an integrated [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluciclovine PET/MRI exam before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Volumes-of-interest (VOIs) of selected organs (prostate, bladder, blood pool) and sub-glandular prostate structures (tumour, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), inflammation, healthy tissue) were delineated on T2-weighted MR images, using whole-mount histology samples as a reference. Three candidate windows for optimal PET imaging were identified based on the dynamic curves of the mean and maximum standardised uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub>, respectively). The statistical significance of differences in SUV between VOIs were analysed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (p<0.05, adjusted for multiple testing). Twenty-eight (28) patients [median (range) age: 66 (55-72) years] were included. An early (W1: 5-10 minutes post-injection) and two late candidate windows (W2: 18-23; W3: 33-38 minutes post-injection) were selected. Late compared with early imaging was better able to distinguish between malignant and benign tissue [W3, SUV<sub>mean</sub>: tumour vs. BPH 2.5 vs. 2.0 (p<0.001), tumour vs. inflammation 2.5 vs. 1.7 (p<0.001), tumour vs. healthy tissue 2.5 vs. 2.0 (p<0.001); W1, SUV<sub>mean</sub>: tumour vs. BPH 3.1 vs. 3.1 (p=0.771), tumour vs inflammation 3.1 vs. 2.2 (p=0.021), tumour vs. healthy tissue 3.1 vs. 2.5 (p<0.001)] as well as between high-grade and low/intermediate-grade tumours (W3, SUV<sub>mean</sub>: 2.6 vs. 2.1 (p=0.040); W1, SUV<sub>mean</sub>: 3.1 vs. 2.8 (p=0.173)). These differences were relevant to the peripheral zone, but not the central gland. Late-window [<sup>18</sup>F]Fluciclovine PET imaging shows promise for distinguishing between prostate tumours and benign tissue and for assessment of tumour aggressiveness.
Medical subject headings
- Carboxylic Acids
- Cyclobutanes
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Radiopharmaceuticals