Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27855089.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754 and PMC identifier 5073481.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population. A community-randomised controlled screening trial. First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada. Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation. Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B). The number of women who participated in cervical screening. Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm. 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0-62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B. Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary. ISRCTN84617261.
Medical subject headings
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Indians, North American
- Papillomaviridae
- Papillomavirus Infections
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Women's Health
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia