PSA-Stratified Performance of <sup>18</sup>F- and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27908968.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.185538.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Several studies outlined the sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled PET tracers against the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for localization of relapsed prostate cancer in patients with renewed increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), commonly referred to as biochemical recurrence. Labeling of PSMA tracers with <sup>18</sup>F offers numerous advantages, including improved image resolution, longer half-life, and increased production yields. The aim of this study was to assess the PSA-stratified performance of the <sup>18</sup>F-labeled PSMA tracer <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL and the <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled reference <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC. <b>Methods:</b> We examined 191 consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence according to standard acquisition protocols using <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL (<i>n</i> = 62, 269.8 MBq, PET scan at 120 min after injection) or <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (<i>n</i> = 129, 158.9 MBq, 60 min after injection). We determined PSA-stratified sensitivity rates for both tracers and corrected our calculations for Gleason scores using iterative matched-pair analyses. As an orthogonal validation, we directly compared tracer distribution patterns in a separate cohort of 25 patients, sequentially examined with both tracers. <b>Results:</b> After prostatectomy (<i>n</i> = 106), the sensitivity of both tracers was significantly associated with absolute PSA levels (<i>P</i> = 4.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>). Sensitivity increased abruptly, when PSA values exceeded 0.5 μg/L (<i>P</i> = 2.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). For a PSA less than 3.5 μg/L, most relapses were diagnosed at a still limited stage (<i>P</i> = 3.4 × 10<sup>-6</sup>). For a PSA of 0.5-3.5 μg/L, PSA-stratified sensitivity was 88% (15/17) for <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL and 66% (23/35) for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC. This significant difference was preserved in the Gleason-matched-pair analysis. Outside of this range, sensitivity was comparably low (PSA < 0.5 μg/L) or high (PSA > 3.5 μg/L). After radiotherapy (<i>n</i> = 85), tracer sensitivity was largely PSA-independent. In the 25 patients examined with both tracers, distribution patterns of <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were strongly comparable (<i>P</i> = 2.71 × 10<sup>-8</sup>). However, in 36% of the PSMA-positive patients we detected additional lesions on the <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL scan (<i>P</i> = 3.7 × 10<sup>-2</sup>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our data suggest that <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL is noninferior to <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, while offering the advantages of <sup>18</sup>F labeling. Our results indicate that imaging with <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL may even exhibit improved sensitivity in localizing relapsed tumors after prostatectomy for moderately increased PSA levels. Although the standard acquisition protocols, used for <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC in this study, stipulate different activity doses and tracer uptake times after injection, our findings provide a promising rationale for validation of <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL in future prospective trials.
Medical subject headings
- Lysine
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Organometallic Compounds
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Urea