Biomechanical Analysis of Cement Augmentation Techniques on Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteopenic Bone: A Cadaveric Study.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27927439.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.10.002.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Three techniques for cement injection into osteopenic pedicles for screw augmentation were compared in a cadaver model. To compare the safety and efficacy of 3 techniques for cement augmentation of pedicle screws in a cadaver model. Cement augmentation of pedicle screws improves fixation in osteopenic spines. Some investigators have used kyphoplasty osteo introducers to inject viscous cement into the pedicle. In addition, a novel fenestrated tapping system was studied that leaves a threaded cement tract for final pedicle screw insertion. This 3-phase biomechanical study compared cement augmentation effects on the cephalocaudal toggle of pedicle screws within 34 fresh osteopenic human cadaveric vertebrae. Phase 1 compared injection through a fenestrated tap to a direct injection. Phase 2 evaluated the fenestrated tap versus injection of more viscous cement using a kyphoplasty osteo inducer. Phase 3 compared kyphoplasty and direct injection techniques. Each vertebral body was prepared with each of the 2 techniques. The pedicle screws were subjected to 10,000 cycles of cephalocaudal toggling, and total vertical displacement of each screw head was measured. In a combined analysis, overall displacement was 2.26 ± 0.57 mm for the direct injection, 2.88 ± 0.56 mm for the kyphoplasty technique, and 3.74 ± 0.59 mm for the fenestrated tap (p < .01). In Phase 1, extravasation of cement occurred in 5% of the fenestrated tap, 86% of the direct injection. Phase 2 results showed that extravasation occurred in 0% for the fenestrated tap group and 18% for the kyphoplasty group. In Phase 3, extravasation of cement was 54% of the direct injection, compared with 31% of the kyphoplasty group. The novel fenestrated tap system provided less resistance to toggle than either of the other 2 techniques but provided a lower incidence of cement extravasation. More viscous cement injected using kyphoplasty technique provides a combination of safety and efficacy.