Performance of adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valves in two different modern anaesthesia machines.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 27988964.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/anae.13689.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The ability to gently ventilate a patient's lungs using a self-inflating bag requires a properly working adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve. We compared the performance of the APL valves of the GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> and the Draeger Fabius anaesthetic machines during closure and opening from 1-20 and from 20-1 cmH<sub>2</sub> O, using standardised experimental baby and adolescent patient lung models. Airway pressures and inspiratory tidal volumes were measured using an ASL-5000 test lung and a GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> near-patient spirometry sensors. In both lung models, the GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> APL valves demonstrated non-linear behaviours for airway pressures and for inspiratory tidal volumes, with a sharp increase at set APL pressure levels of 8-10 cmH<sub>2</sub> O. With further closure of the GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> APL valves up to 20 cmH<sub>2</sub> O, inspiratory tidal volumes decreased to ~50% of the highest values measured. Airway pressures in the Draeger Fabius APL valves demonstrated a near linear increase and decrease. Airway pressure values measured in the Draeger Fabius were never higher than those set by the APL valves, whereas in the GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> , they considerably exceeded set pressures (by up to 27 cmH<sub>2</sub> O). We conclude that the performance of the GE Aisys CS<sup>2</sup> APL valve does not allow safe bag-assisted ventilation of a patient's lungs.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia, Inhalation
- Respiration, Artificial