The effect of pair-based monetary contingency contracts for weight loss: Results from a randomized controlled pilot study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28145064.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/oby.21758.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Monetary contingency contracts (MCCs), in which deposited money is returned contingent on weight loss, could promote weight/adiposity reduction. This study piloted individual- and pair-based MCCs (when refunds are contingent on two individuals losing weight) and assessed effects on weight/body composition. Seventy-seven participants with BMI greater than 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were recruited. In a non-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in a university laboratory setting, participants were randomized in pairs via a computer-generated sequence to one of four conditions: partner with pair-based refund (P-PBR), partner with individual refund (P-IR), individual weight loss with individual refund (I-IR), or no MCC (comparison). Refunds were contingent on weight loss after 4 and 8 weeks; weight/body composition was measured at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were change in weight and fat mass. Seventy-seven participants (P-PBR n = 16; P-IR n = 20; I-IR n = 22; comparison n = 19) were recruited. Deposit amount was significantly positively associated with reductions in weight/BMI. At 8 weeks, the P-PBR condition reduced fat mass more than all other conditions (P < 0.05) and reduced weight/BMI more than the I-IR condition (P < 0.05). The large effect of P-PBR on fat mass suggests it would be valuable to conduct a fully powered, randomized controlled trial of pair-based MCCs.
Medical subject headings
- Adiposity
- Behavior Therapy
- Body Mass Index
- Body Weight
- Obesity
- Weight Loss