<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival after <sup>90</sup>Y transarterial radioembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28233086.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3653-0.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the value of pretreatment functional and morphological imaging parameters for predicting survival in patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization using yttrium-90 (<sup>90</sup>Y-TARE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We analysed data from 48 patients in our prospective database undergoing <sup>90</sup>Y-TARE treatment for uHCC (31 resin, 17 glass). All patients underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and morphological imaging (CT and MRI scans) as part of a pretherapeutic work-up. Patients did not receive any treatment between these imaging procedures and <sup>90</sup>Y-TARE. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to assess the prognostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters, including SUV<sub>max</sub>, tumour-to-liver (T/L) uptake ratio and SUV<sub>mean</sub> of healthy liver, and morphological data, including number and size of lesions, portal-venous infiltration (PVI). Relevant prognostic factors for HCC including Child-Pugh class, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, tumour size, PVI and serum AFP level were compared with metabolic parameters in univariate and multivariate analyses. The median follow-up in living patients was 16.2 months (range 11.4-50.1 months). Relapse occurred in 34 patients (70.8%) at a median of 7.4 months (range 1.4-27.9 months) after <sup>90</sup>Y-TARE, and relapse occurred in 24 of 34 patients (70.8%) who died from their disease at a median of 8.1 months (range 2.2-35.2 months). Significant prognostic markers for PFS were the mean and median lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> (both P = 0.01; median PFS 10.2 vs. 7.4 months), and significant prognostic markers for OS were the first quarter (Q1) cut-off values for lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> and T/L uptake ratio (both P = 0.02; median OS 30.9 vs. 9 months). The multivariate analysis confirmed that lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> and T/L uptake ratio were independent negative predictors of PFS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.1, P = 0.02, for mean SUV<sub>max</sub>; HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.9, P = 0.02, for median SUV<sub>max</sub>:) and OS (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1-10.9, P = 0.04 for Q1 SUV<sub>max</sub>; HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.2, P = 0.03, for Q1 T/L uptake ratio), respectively, when testing with either the BCLC staging system or serum AFP level. Lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> and T/L uptake ratio as assessed by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, but not morphological imaging, were predictive markers of survival in patients undergoing <sup>90</sup>Y-TARE for uHCC.
Medical subject headings
- Arteries
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Embolization, Therapeutic
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Liver Neoplasms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Yttrium Radioisotopes