A comparison of minimally invasive approach vs conventional approach for volar plating of distal radial fractures.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28246046.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.aott.2017.02.013 and PMC identifier 6197448.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to introduce and to evaluate the functional results of volar plating of distal radial fractures through a longitudinal minimally invasive approach. From January 2010 to January 2013, 157 patients with distal radial fractures were randomly allocated to group A (n = 83; 49 men, 34 women; mean age: 42 (18-67)) and B (n = 74; 46 men, 28 women; mean age: 41 (22-65)), including type A2, A3, B3, C1, and C2 fractures, based on AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification. Patients in group A were treated through a 1.5- to 2-cm longitudinal incision, and patients in group B were treated through the conventional flexor carpi radialis approach. All fractures were treated with a locking volar plate. The functional results were compared with range of motion, grip and pronation strengths for each fracture type. After a follow-up of 2 years, similar measurements were noted on range of motion and grip strength in both groups. Regarding pronation strength, group A was superior to group B (p < 0.05). Minimally invasive volar plating of distal radial fractures is a safe and reliable technique, resulting in better pronation function and appearance. Level I, Therapeutic study.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Plates
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
- Radius Fractures
Anatomy
- radius