Role of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Posttreatment Evaluation of Anal Carcinoma.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28280225.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.185280.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG as a strategy for response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. For this, the performance of posttreatment <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, the impact on patient care, and the predictive value of metabolic response were assessed. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective and multicenter analysis of 87 patients treated by chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma between October 2007 and October 2013. All patients underwent systematic posttreatment <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and were followed with at least a clinical examination every 4 mo for 2 y and every 6 mo thereafter. Disease progression was confirmed by biopsy for all patients in the case of local recurrence before surgery. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to test for associations between metabolic or clinical endpoints and progression-free survival (PFS) or cause-specific survival (CSS). <b>Results:</b> The median follow-up was 25 mo. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was performed 1-8 mo (median, 4 mo) after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Overall, 25 patients relapsed and 13 died. The posttherapy <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT did not show any abnormal <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake (complete metabolic response [CMR]) in 55 patients whereas 32 displayed incomplete response (non-CMR): 15 patients with partial response and 17 with disease progression. The sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT to detect residual tumor tissue was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-97%), specificity was 85% (95% CI, 75%-92%), positive predictive value was 72% (95% CI, 61%-90%), and negative predictive value was 96.4% (95% CI, 90%-98.7%). The 2-y PFS was 96% (95% CI, 90-100) for patients with CMR and 28% (95% CI, 14-47) for non-CMR patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The 2-y CSS was 100% for patients with CMR and 59% (95% CI, 42-84) for those without CMR (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT changed patient management in 14 cases (16%), with relevant modifications in 12 (14%). A Cox proportional hazards model of survival outcome indicated that a CMR was the only significant predictor of PFS and CSS (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT shows good accuracy in posttreatment evaluation of anal cancer and has a relevant impact on patient management. Moreover, CMR is associated with good survival outcome. Thus, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT may play a significant role during posttreatment follow-up of anal cancer.
Medical subject headings
- Anus Neoplasms
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography