Strategies for handling missing clinical data for automated surgical site infection detection from the electronic health record.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28323112.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.009 and PMC identifier 5474942.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Proper handling of missing data is important for many secondary uses of electronic health record (EHR) data. Data imputation methods can be used to handle missing data, but their use for analyzing EHR data is limited and specific efficacy for postoperative complication detection is unclear. Several data imputation methods were used to develop data models for automated detection of three types (i.e., superficial, deep, and organ space) of surgical site infection (SSI) and overall SSI using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Registry 30-day SSI occurrence data as a reference standard. Overall, models with missing data imputation almost always outperformed reference models without imputation that included only cases with complete data for detection of SSI overall achieving very good average area under the curve values. Missing data imputation appears to be an effective means for improving postoperative SSI detection using EHR clinical data.
Medical subject headings
- Data Collection
- Electronic Health Records
- Quality Improvement
- Surgical Wound Infection