Occlusive drainage system for split-thickness skin graft: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28341261.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.025.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Split-thickness skin grafts are widely used in reconstruction of large area defects. Conventional postoperative recipient site care includes saline-moistened gauze with a protective layer of petroleum gauze and splints for immobilization. This method causes pain while changing the dressing. We designed a better occlusive drainage system for split-thickness skin grafts. We compared the treatment effect and subjective evaluation of our occlusive drainage system with that of the conventional method for coverage of split-thickness skin grafts. A randomized controlled trial was carried out in patients who received split-thickness skin grafts. Patients aged 24-76 years were randomly assigned to the occlusive drainage system or the conventional indirect wet dressing method. The status of graft take, pain, and subjective evaluations were compared. Twenty-eight participants were enrolled, with 14 in each group. The percentage of graft take was no difference between the 2 groups. No wound infection developed. Patients in the occlusive drainage system group experienced less pain and greater satisfaction. All patients followed up for at least 3 months, and no hypertrophic scar formation was noted. Comparing with the indirect wet dressing method, this new method is practical for covering split-thickness skin grafts, causes less pain, and provides a better experience for patients.
Medical subject headings
- Burns
- Drainage
- Occlusive Dressings
- Skin Transplantation
- Wound Healing