Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28426295.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303706 and PMC identifier 5425852.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In 2004, Murray et al. reviewed methodological developments in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials (GRTs). We have highlighted the developments of the past 13 years in design with a companion article to focus on developments in analysis. As a pair, these articles update the 2004 review. We have discussed developments in the topics of the earlier review (e.g., clustering, matching, and individually randomized group-treatment trials) and in new topics, including constrained randomization and a range of randomized designs that are alternatives to the standard parallel-arm GRT. These include the stepped-wedge GRT, the pseudocluster randomized trial, and the network-randomized GRT, which, like the parallel-arm GRT, require clustering to be accounted for in both their design and analysis.
Medical subject headings
- Cluster Analysis
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Research Design