Selection of patients for intra-arterial treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: development and validation of a clinical decision tool in two randomised trials.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28468840.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1710 and PMC identifier 5418887.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<b>Objective</b> To improve the selection of patients with acute ischaemic stroke for intra-arterial treatment using a clinical decision tool to predict individual treatment benefit.<b>Design</b> Multivariable regression modelling with data from two randomised controlled clinical trials.<b>Setting</b> 16 hospitals in the Netherlands (derivation cohort) and 58 hospitals in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe (validation cohort).<b>Participants</b> 500 patients from the Multicenter Randomised Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in the Netherlands trial (derivation cohort) and 260 patients with intracranial occlusion from the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial (validation cohort).<b>Main outcome measures</b> The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after stroke. We constructed an ordinal logistic regression model to predict outcome and treatment benefit, defined as the difference between the predicted probability of good functional outcome (mRS score 0-2) with and without intra-arterial treatment.<b>Results</b> 11 baseline clinical and radiological characteristics were included in the model. The externally validated C statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.73) for the ordinal model and 0.73 (0.67 to 0.79) for the prediction of good functional outcome, indicating moderate discriminative ability. The mean predicted treatment benefit varied between patients in the combined derivation and validation cohort from -2.3% to 24.3%. There was benefit of intra-arterial treatment predicted for some individual patients from groups in which no treatment effect was found in previous subgroup analyses, such as those with no or poor collaterals.<b>Conclusion</b> The proposed clinical decision tool combines multiple baseline clinical and radiological characteristics and shows large variations in treatment benefit between patients. The tool is clinically useful as it aids in distinguishing between individual patients who may experience benefit from intra-arterial treatment for acute ischaemic stroke and those who will not.<b>Trial registration</b> clinicaltrials.gov NCT00359424 (IMS III) and isrctn.com ISRCTN10888758 (MR CLEAN).
Medical subject headings
- Aged
- Australia
- Brain Ischemia
- Brain Ischemia/surgery
- Canada
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Endovascular Procedures
- Europe
- Female
- Humans
- Logistic Models
- Male
- Multivariate Analysis
- Patient Selection
- Prognosis
- Severity of Illness Index
- Stroke
- Stroke/surgery
- Treatment Outcome
- United States