Evaluation of Sinus/Edge-Corrected Zero-Echo-Time-Based Attenuation Correction in Brain PET/MRI.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28473594.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.188268 and PMC identifier 6944168.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In brain PET/MRI, the major challenge of zero-echo-time (ZTE)-based attenuation correction (ZTAC) is the misclassification of air/tissue/bone mixtures or their boundaries. Our study aimed to evaluate a sinus/edge-corrected (SEC) ZTAC (ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub>), relative to an uncorrected (UC) ZTAC (ZTAC<sub>UC</sub>) and a CT atlas-based attenuation correction (ATAC). <b>Methods:</b> Whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI scans were obtained for 12 patients after PET/CT scans. Only data acquired at a bed station that included the head were used for this study. Using PET data from PET/MRI, we applied ZTAC<sub>UC</sub>, ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub>, ATAC, and reference CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) to PET attenuation correction. For ZTAC<sub>UC</sub>, the bias-corrected and normalized ZTE was converted to pseudo-CT with air (-1,000 HU for ZTE < 0.2), soft-tissue (42 HU for ZTE > 0.75), and bone (-2,000 × [ZTE - 1] + 42 HU for 0.2 ≤ ZTE ≤ 0.75). Afterward, in the pseudo-CT, sinus/edges were automatically estimated as a binary mask through morphologic processing and edge detection. In the binary mask, the overestimated values were rescaled below 42 HU for ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub> For ATAC, the atlas deformed to MR in-phase was segmented to air, inner air, soft tissue, and continuous bone. For the quantitative evaluation, PET mean uptake values were measured in twenty 1-mL volumes of interest distributed throughout brain tissues. The PET uptake was compared using a paired <i>t</i> test. An error histogram was used to show the distribution of voxel-based PET uptake differences. <b>Results:</b> Compared with CTAC, ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub> achieved the overall PET quantification accuracy (0.2% ± 2.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.23) similar to CTAC, in comparison with ZTAC<sub>UC</sub> (5.6% ± 3.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and ATAC (-0.9% ± 5.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.03). Specifically, a substantial improvement with ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub> (0.6% ± 2.7%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) was found in the cerebellum, in comparison with ZTAC<sub>UC</sub> (8.1% ± 3.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and ATAC (-4.1% ± 4.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The histogram of voxel-based uptake differences demonstrated that ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub> reduced the magnitude and variation of errors substantially, compared with ZTAC<sub>UC</sub> and ATAC. <b>Conclusion:</b> ZTAC<sub>SEC</sub> can provide an accurate PET quantification in brain PET/MRI, comparable to the accuracy achieved by CTAC, particularly in the cerebellum.
Medical subject headings
- Brain
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Multimodal Imaging
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography