Comparison of the Outcomes Between Headless Cannulated Screw Fixation and Fixation Using a Locking Compression Distal Ulna Hook Plate in Fracture of Fifth Metatarsal Base.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiologic results of internal fixation with a headless cannulated screw versus a locking compression distal ulna hook plate for fractures at the base of the fifth metatarsal bone, zone 1. From April 2012 to April 2015, 30 cases (29 patients) were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups stratified by the fixation method: screw (group A, n = 15) or plate (group B, n = 15). We measured the displacement to diastasis of the fracture on the foot oblique radiographs taken pre- and postoperatively in each group, recorded the time to bony union, and measured the difference in the reduction distance in each group. The clinical results were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score at 12 months postoperatively. In group A, the mean interval to union was 54.2 ± 9.3 days, the mean displacement to diastasis had improved to 0.3 ± 0.4 mm postoperatively (p < .001), and the mean reduction distance was 2.9 ± 1.0 mm postoperatively. In group B, the mean interval to union was 41.5 ± 7.0 days, the mean displacement to diastasis had improved to 0.06 ± 0.2 mm postoperatively (p < .001), and the mean reduction distance was 4.1 ± 1.6 mm. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scale score was 97.7 ± 3.4 in group A and 98.2 ± 3.2 in group B. The interval to union was significantly different between the 2 groups (p = .01). No complications were recorded. Our findings have shown that the plate is a reasonable and alternative method for the surgical treatment of fifth metatarsal base fractures.