Even "Cementless" Surgeons Use Cement.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28502535.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.044.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patients presenting with hip arthritis have huge variability in anatomy, bone quality, and functional expectation. These can contribute to a varying degree of complexity on both the femoral and acetabular sides. Surgeons should be aware of all the various options in fixation, bearing surface, and surgical technique. In this article, based on a presentation given at the recent American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons meeting in Dallas, we will discuss why and how cemented fixation can, and indeed should, be considered when making decisions regarding how a primary, complex primary, or revision hip arthroplasty should be performed. We will review the evidence, surgical technique, and indications for cemented fixation in primary and complex primary surgery. In addition, we will discuss the potential benefits at revision of previous cemented fixation. We hope to support the concept that even cementless surgeons should also use cement.
Medical subject headings
- Acetabulum
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Bone Cements
- Femur
- Hip Prosthesis
Anatomy
- femur
- hip