Feasibility of atlas-based active bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

Li, Nan; Noticewala, Sonal S; Williamson, Casey W; Shen, Hanjie; Sirak, Igor; Tarnawski, Rafal; Mahantshetty, Umesh; Hoh, Carl K et al. · Radiother Oncol · 2017

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that atlas-based active bone marrow (ABM)-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) yields similar dosimetric results compared to custom ABM-sparing IMRT for cervical cancer patients. We sampled 62 cervical cancer patients with pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT in training (n=32) or test (n=30) sets. ABM was defined as the subvolume of the pelvic bone marrow (PBM) with standardized uptake value (SUV) above the mean on the average FDG-PET image (ABM<sub>Atlas</sub>) vs. the individual's PET (ABM<sub>Custom</sub>). Both were deformed to the planning CT. Overlap between the two subvolumes was measured using the Dice coefficient. Three IMRT plans designed to spare PBM, ABM<sub>Atlas</sub>, or ABM<sub>Custom</sub> were compared for 30 test patients. Dosimetric parameters were used to evaluate plan quality. ABM<sub>Atlas</sub> and ABM<sub>Custom</sub> volumes were not significantly different (p=0.90), with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.75, indicating good agreement. Compared to IMRT plans designed to spare PBM and ABM<sub>Custom</sub>, ABM<sub>Atlas</sub>-sparing IMRT plans achieved excellent target coverage and normal tissue sparing, without reducing dose to ABM<sub>Custom</sub> (mean ABM<sub>Custom</sub> dose 29.4Gy vs. 27.1Gyvs. 26.9Gy, respectively; p=0.10); however, PTV coverage and bowel sparing were slightly reduced. Atlas-based ABM sparing IMRT is clinically feasible and may obviate the need for customized ABM-sparing as a strategy to reduce hematologic toxicity.

Medical subject headings