Measurement of combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesions in anterior shoulder instability.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28588656.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1758573216681208 and PMC identifier 5444602.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recurrent glenohumeral anterior instability (RGAI) frequently induces combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone lesions and is a risk factor for soft tissue repair failure. This cohort study describes a simple preoperative quantification method for bone loss, the Clock method, the first that combines glenoid and humeral lesions. Computed tomography scans of 34 shoulders with RGAI were twice reviewed by three independent observers, who measured bone lesions using the new Clock method and existing validated methods. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Clock method was evaluated (intraclass correlation coefficient). Pearson correlation was used to correlate Clock method with existing methods, and with function (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria: three females and 29 males, mean age 28 years. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.817 to 0.938 for the novel Clock method. Humeral Clock and Glenoid Clock strongly correlated with Humeral Ratio (<i>r</i> = 0.882, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Glenoid Surface Area and Glenoid Ratio (<i>r</i> = 0.793 and 0.717, <i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The classic threshold of 25% of the glenoid diameter with the Glenoid Ratio method corresponds to 4 hours with the Glenoid Clock method. The Clock method is quick and reliable, with more studies being needed to investigate whether it is correlated with surgical outcomes.
Anatomy
- shoulder