Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28597401.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00590-017-1989-6.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
For proximal femur fractures, long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are often selected to avoid a diaphyseal stress riser at the tip of a shorter nail. Secondary peri-implant fracture rates for long and short CMN have not been shown to differ clinically. This study biomechanically compares both CMN in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric femora with short or long CMN were axially loaded and internally rotated to failure. Resulting fractures involved distal interlocking screws of the short and long CMN. Energy and rotation to failure were significantly greater for short CMN. Torque at failure trended higher for short CMN but not significantly. No statistical difference was detected in stiffness of the short and long CMN. A greater risk of secondary fracture is not indicated for short versus long CMN under torsional stress. Short CMN may be suitable in the younger patient.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Nails
- Bone Screws
- Femoral Fractures
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
- Periprosthetic Fractures
Anatomy
- femur