Optimizing Mechanical Alignment With Modular Stems in Revision TKA.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28648709.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.039.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Although mechanical alignment is critical for optimal function and long-term implant durability, the role of modular stems in achieving ideal alignment is unclear. We identified 319 revision total knee arthroplasty from 2003-2013, for which stem length, stem diameter, and stem fixation method were recorded prospectively. Three-dimensional canal-filling ratio, the product of canal-filling ratio at the stem tip in both the anteroposterior and lateral planes, and alignment were measured radiographically. Ideal alignment of the femur was considered to be 95° in the anteroposterior (AP) plane and from 1° of extension to 4° of flexion in the lateral plane, and ideal tibial alignment was considered to be 90° in the AP plane. Even after accounting for difference in stem size and canal-fill, ideal AP alignment was more reliably achieved with press-fit stems. Furthermore, increased engagement of the diaphysis and its anatomical axis with canal-filling stems facilitates accurate alignment.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- femur
- knee
- tibia