Primary hip and knee arthroplasty in a temporary operating theatre is associated with a significant increase in deep periprosthetic infection.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28663397.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-1293.R1.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Infection following total hip or knee arthroplasty is a serious complication. We noted an increase in post-operative infection in cases carried out in temporary operating theatres. We therefore compared those cases performed in standard and temporary operating theatres and examined the deep periprosthetic infection rates. A total of 1223 primary hip and knee arthroplasties were performed between August 2012 and June 2013. A total of 539 (44%) were performed in temporary theatres. The two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. The deep infection rate for standard operating theatres was 0 of 684 (0%); for temporary theatres it was eight of 539 (1.5%) (p = 0.001). Use of a temporary operating theatre for primary hip and knee arthroplasty was associated with an unacceptable increase in deep infection. We do not advocate the use of these theatres for primary joint arthroplasty. Cite this article: <i>Bone Joint J</i> 2017;99-B:917-20.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Cross Infection
- Operating Rooms
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Surgical Wound Infection
Anatomy
- hip
- knee