Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28669420.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Radius
- Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital
Anatomy
- radius