Is Cardioprotection Dead?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28674094.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027039 and PMC identifier 5814253.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
For >4 decades, the holy grail in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been the mitigation of lethal injury. Despite promising initial results and decades of investigation by the cardiology research community, the only treatment with proven efficacy is early reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. The remarkable record of failure has led us and others to wonder if cardioprotection is dead. The path to translation, like the ascent to Everest, is certainly littered with corpses. We do, however, highlight a therapeutic principle that provides a glimmer of hope: cellular postconditioning. Administration of cardiosphere-derived cells after reperfusion limits infarct size measured acutely, while providing long-term structural and functional benefits. The recognition that cell therapy may be cardioprotective, and not just regenerative, merits further exploration before we abandon the pursuit entirely.
Medical subject headings
- Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
- Ischemic Postconditioning
- Myocardial Infarction
- Myocardial Reperfusion
- Myocytes, Cardiac