A comparative review of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the national operative quality improvement database.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28720226.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.010.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with endovascular techniques has emerged as the first line of therapy, due to procedural ease and excellent patient outcomes. Open aneurysm repair is increasingly used as a secondary option for lesions with anatomic complexity that involve arterial branches. Understanding the impact of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair on the shift in vascular operation practice for abdominal aortic aneurysms repair, requires a comprehensive and risk-adjusted review of operative outcomes between the 2 repair types. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project is a comprehensive, outcomes-based program, which provides valuable data on operative complications with endovascular and open repair. In this review, we use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database to critically review complications, mortality, and morbidity associated with endovascular and open abdominal aneurysmal repair.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
- Databases, Factual
- Endovascular Procedures
- Quality Improvement