General Health Status After Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Acute, Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28832388.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000881.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess the general health status of patients after nonoperative (Non-op) versus operative (OP) treatment for acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in 11 Canadian trauma centers. A total of 83 patients with acute (≤28 days old), complete (Rockwood grades III, IV, or V) dislocations of the AC joint were included in this study. Participants were randomized to Non-op treatment or OP treatment with hook plate fixation. Physical and mental health were evaluated using the Short Form-36 version 2 survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. In the Non-op group, 33 patients had grade III injuries, 3 patients had grade IV injuries, 5 patients had grade V injuries, and the injury grade was unknown for 2 patients. In the OP group, 37 patients had grade III injuries and 3 patients had grade V injuries (no difference in Type IV and V Non-op vs. OP, P = 0.12). Fifty-eight percent of patients in the Non-op group and 63% of patients in the OP group completed the 2-year follow-up. The Non-op group had better physical health scores than the OP group at 3 months after treatment (52.13 vs. 45.75, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the physical health scores of the 2 groups at any other point (6 weeks, 45.81 vs. 41.21, P = 0.03; 6 months, 54.50 vs. 51.61, P = 0.02; 1 year, 55.10 vs. 53.96, P = 0.37; 2 years, 55.24 vs. 57.13, P = 0.17). Mental health scores were similar between the Non-op and OP groups at each follow-up interval (6 weeks, 49.29 vs. 51.27, P = 0.49; 3 months, 52.24 vs. 55.84, P = 0.13; 6 months, 54.89 vs. 55.05, P = 0.93; 1 year, 55.35 vs. 56.72, P = 0.35; 2 years, 56.41 vs. 55.43, P = 0.56). In both treatment groups, the preinjury physical and mental health scores were better than published population norms before declining to a level equal to or below the norm after dislocation. Physical health recovered to a level above the norm at 6 months in the Non-op group and 2 years in the OP group. Mental health recovered at 3 months in the OP group and 6 months in the Non-op group. Hook plate fixation does not lead to improved general health status compared with Non-op treatment. Presently, there is no definitive evidence that hook plate fixation is superior to Non-op treatment for acute complete AC joint dislocations. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Medical subject headings
- Acromioclavicular Joint
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Fracture Healing
- Health Status
- Joint Dislocations
Anatomy
- clavicle