Short-Term Outcome Comparison Between Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Approach and Open Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Technique for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Abstract

To compare postoperative pain control and functional outcome between full-endoscopic interlaminar approach (FEIA) and open minimally invasive microsurgical technique (MMST) for lumbar discectomy. All consecutive patients treated with FEIA were prospectively followed. Clinical outcome parameters (low back and leg numeric rating scale and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale) were measured. Analgesics use after surgery was quantified. Results were compared with a cohort of patients treated in the same period with MMST. The decision regarding which surgical technique to use was based on endoscope availability only. There were 26 patients treated with FEIA and 18 treated with MMST. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable. Sciatic pain was treated in both groups. Postoperative back pain was significantly lower in the FEIA group (numeric rating scale scores 1.5, 0.3, and 0.2 at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after FEIA vs. 3.6, 2.4, and 1.6 after MMST). In the FEIA group, 61.5% of patients did not take any pain medication. The average number of analgesics taken within 30 days was 4.0 in the FEIA group and 27.2 in the MMST group. The average Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score decreased from 57.7 to 25.0, 18.0, and 14.2 at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after FEIA compared with a decrease from 58.8 to 41.1, 34.7, and 23.0 in the MMST group. No approach-related complications were reported. With less analgesic use, back and leg pain relief after 1 week in the FEIA group was comparable to that achieved in the MMST group after 1 month. This was also true for overall ability of patients to perform daily activities.