Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Tesche, Christian; De Cecco, Carlo N; Albrecht, Moritz H; Duguay, Taylor M; Bayer, Richard R; Litwin, Sheldon E; Steinberg, Daniel H; Schoepf, U Joseph · Radiology · 2017

review · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) by means of a pressure wire technique is the established reference standard for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) ( 1 , 2 ). Coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography has emerged as a noninvasive method for direct assessment of CAD and plaque characterization with high diagnostic accuracy compared with ICA ( 3 , 4 ). However, the solely anatomic assessment provided with both coronary CT angiography and ICA has poor discriminatory power for ischemia-inducing lesions. FFR derived from standard coronary CT angiography (FFR<sub>CT</sub>) data sets by using any of several advanced computational analytic approaches enables combined anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of a coronary lesion by a single noninvasive test. Current technical approaches to the calculation of FFR<sub>CT</sub> include algorithms based on full- and reduced-order computational fluid dynamic modeling, as well as artificial intelligence deep machine learning ( 5 , 6 ). A growing body of evidence has validated the diagnostic accuracy of FFR<sub>CT</sub> techniques compared with invasive FFR. Improved therapeutic guidance has been demonstrated, showing the potential of FFR<sub>CT</sub> to streamline and rationalize the care of patients suspected of having CAD and improve outcomes while reducing overall health care costs ( 7 , 8 ). The purpose of this review is to describe the scientific principles, clinical validation, and implementation of various FFR<sub>CT</sub> approaches, their precursors, and related imaging tests. <sup>©</sup> RSNA, 2017.

Medical subject headings