Where Do Arthroscopy Editors Stand on Systematic Reviews of the Literature?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 28969810.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.002.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Systematic reviews seem overly prevalent and often inconclusive. Yet, well-performed reviews provide powerful answers to clinical questions, whereas the results of a single clinical trial may not be reliably reproducible. Thus, in balance, we rest highly in favor of rigorously performed synthetic studies that stand at the top of the evidence-based medicine hierarchy.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroscopy
- Editorial Policies
- Review Literature as Topic