Early-Claim Modifiable Factors Associated With Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Among Workers Injured at Work: Are There Differences Between Psychological and Musculoskeletal Injuries?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29019817.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001172.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate modifiable early-injury factors which are associated with self-efficacy to return-to-work (RTW-SE) and explore whether these factors are different for people with psychological or upper-body musculoskeletal (UB-MSK) injuries. The study used a sample of workers with a UB-MSK (N = 244) or psychological (N = 113) injury who were off work. Differences between injury types were investigated across variables related to: (1) communication with RTW stakeholders; and (2) components of the job itself. A stratified and multigroup analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM). Injury-stratified models revealed no significant differences. In a combined model, higher job autonomy and low-stress contact from the RTW coordinator remained significantly associated with higher RTW-SE. Job autonomy and low-stress contact from the RTW coordinator are possible areas to target to increase self-efficacy among injured workers.
Medical subject headings
- Mental Disorders
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Occupational Injuries
- Return to Work
- Self Efficacy