Racial and Geographic Disparities in Interhospital ICU Transfers.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29068859.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002776 and PMC identifier 5743219.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Interhospital transfer, a common intervention, may be subject to healthcare disparities. In mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, we hypothesize that disparities not disease related would be found between patients who were and were not transferred. Retrospective cohort study. Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2012. Patients over 18 years old with a primary diagnosis of sepsis who underwent mechanical ventilation. None. We obtained age, gender, length of stay, race, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, and Elixhauser comorbidities. The outcome used was interhospital transfer from a small- or medium-sized hospital to a larger acute care hospital. Of 55,208,382 hospitalizations, 46,406 patients met inclusion criteria. In the multivariate model, patients were less likely to be transferred if the following were present: older age (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.978-0.982), black race (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), Hispanic race (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90), South region hospital (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88), teaching hospital (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.28-0.33), and do not resuscitate status (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.15-0.25). In mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, we found significant disparities in race and geographic location not explained by medical diagnoses or illness severity.
Medical subject headings
- Healthcare Disparities
- Intensive Care Units
- Patient Transfer
- Racism
- Respiration, Artificial
- Sepsis