Influence of the number and position of stripped screws on plate-screw construct biomechanical properties.

Abstract

Screw stripping is a common situation in fracture fixation, particularly in osteopenic bone treatment. Surgeons' perception of screw stripping is relatively poor and the real number of loose screws in every plate-screw construct is unknown. The biomechanical and clinical implications of the different possible screw-stripping situations are also unidentified. In this study, construct stiffness in different scenarios of stripped screws is investigated. A bone surrogate comminuted osteoporotic fracture was fixed with four screws in both sides of the fracture gap in 75 specimens. In four groups, one or two screws closest or distal to the gap were over-tightened and left in place in one part of the construct and the remaining screws were tightened with 0.3N m torque (four groups). In the fifth group (control), all the screws were tightened with 0.3N m torque. Construct stiffness was tested in terms of compression, bending, and torsion for 1000 cycles. When one or two screws closest to the gap were stripped, stiffness only decreased by, respectively, 5.7% or 7.6% under compression and 4.7% or 6.7% under bending; however, stiffness in torsion was 15.1% or 32%, respectively, lower than the initial stiffness. When a screw distal to the gap was stripped, the stiffness decreased by 28% under bending and 10% under compression; no change was noted under torsion. When two screws distal to the gap were stripped, the stiffness decreased by 11% in compression, collapsed under bending, and decreased by 8% under torsion. Position and number of stripped screws affect the biomechanical properties of a construct in different ways, depending on the acting forces.