Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health Outcomes: A Call to Standardize Fitness Categories.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29174511.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.011.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
An inverse association between physical activity or fitness status and health outcomes has been reported by several cohort studies. When fitness categories are established in quartiles or quintiles based on the peak exercise capacity achieved, the association is graded. Although significant health benefits of increased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) have been uniformly reported, the degree of protection has varied substantially between studies. This variability is likely due to varying methods used to define CRF categories, and not considering age, despite its strong effect on CRF. To ameliorate these methodological discrepancies, we propose standardized guidelines by which age-specific CRF categories should be defined.
Medical subject headings
- Age Factors
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness
- Metabolic Equivalent