Editorial Commentary: Hamstring Autograft With Preserved Insertions Versus Free Hamstring Autograft in Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinically the Same but Statistically Different.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29198357.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.279.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There is considerable debate over the ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in athletes. The use of a hamstring autograft with preserved insertions is an approach to ACL reconstruction that may lead to earlier healing and less morbidity in comparison to a free hamstring autograft. When compared in a randomized trial, statistically significant but clinically irrelevant differences in clinical outcome and instrumented laxity were observed. These contradictory findings highlight the importance of examining the results from many vantage points and further demonstrate the misleading conclusions that may result from reliance on P values.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anatomy
- knee