Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29218619.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-017-5136-x and PMC identifier 5882618.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59-94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85-95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50-88%) and 84% (95% CI 77-90%), respectively. In patients with a negative <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases. • PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography. • Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary. • Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA.
Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Lymph Nodes
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Radiopharmaceuticals
- Ultrasonography