The diagnostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI in suspected vertebral osteomyelitis - a prospective study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29256136.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3912-0 and PMC identifier 5978906.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis. From November 2015 until December 2016, 32 patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis were prospectively included. All patients underwent both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI within 48 h. All images were independently reevaluated by two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to each others' image interpretation. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI were compared to the clinical diagnosis according to international guidelines. For <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis were 100%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively. For MRI, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 91.7%, 95.2%, and 100%, respectively. MRI detected more epidural/spinal abscesses. An important advantage of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is the detection of metastatic infection (16 patients, 50.0%). <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI are both necessary techniques in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis. An important advantage of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is the visualization of metastatic infection, especially in patients with bacteremia. MRI is more sensitive in detection of small epidural abscesses.
Medical subject headings
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Osteomyelitis
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography