Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29330169.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314165.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater reliability between nursing staff for the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS). Retrospective observational study. Single-centre paediatric emergency department. 12 participants from a convenience sample of 21 nursing staff. Participants were shown video footage of three pre-recorded paediatric assessments and asked to record their own POPS for each child. The participants were blinded to the original, in-person POPS. Further data were gathered in the form of a questionnaire to determine the level of training and experience the candidate had using the POPS score prior to undertaking this study. Inter-rater reliability among participants scoring of the POPS. Overall kappa value for case 1 was 0.74 (95% CI 0.605 to 0.865), case 2 was 1 (perfect agreement) and case 3 was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.744). This study suggests there is good inter-rater reliability between different nurses' use of POPS in assessing sick children in the emergency department.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Service, Hospital
- Pediatric Nursing
- Triage