How fast does a random walk cover a torus?
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29347167.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012115.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We present high statistics simulation data for the average time 〈T_{cover}(L)〉 that a random walk needs to cover completely a two-dimensional torus of size L×L. They confirm the mathematical prediction that 〈T_{cover}(L)〉∼(LlnL)^{2} for large L, but the prefactor seems to deviate significantly from the supposedly exact result 4/π derived by Dembo et al. [Ann. Math. 160, 433 (2004)ANMAAH0003-486X10.4007/annals.2004.160.433], if the most straightforward extrapolation is used. On the other hand, we find that this scaling does hold for the time T_{N(t)=1}(L) at which the average number of yet unvisited sites is 1, as also predicted previously. This might suggest (wrongly) that 〈T_{cover}(L)〉 and T_{N(t)=1}(L) scale differently, although the distribution of rescaled cover times becomes sharp in the limit L→∞. But our results can be reconciled with those of Dembo et al. by a very slow and nonmonotonic convergence of 〈T_{cover}(L)〉/(LlnL)^{2}, as had been indeed proven by Belius et al. [Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 167, 461 (2017)10.1007/s00440-015-0689-6] for Brownian walks, and was conjectured by them to hold also for lattice walks.