Head-to-Head Comparison of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 and <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 for Quantification of the Translocator Protein in the Human Brain.

Zanotti-Fregonara, Paolo; Pascual, Belen; Rizzo, Gaia; Yu, Meixiang; Pal, Neha; Beers, David; Carter, Randall; Appel, Stanley H et al. · J Nucl Med · 2018

Where this comes from

Abstract

<sup>18</sup>F-GE180 is a third-generation PET tracer for quantifying the translocator protein (TSPO), a biomarker for inflammation. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 and the well-established TSPO tracer <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 by scanning with both tracers during the same day in the same subjects. <b>Methods:</b> Five subjects underwent a 90-min PET scan with <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 in the morning and <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 in the afternoon. A metabolite-corrected arterial input function was obtained in each subject for both tracers, and the brain uptake was quantified with a 2-tissue-compartment model. <b>Results:</b> The rate of metabolism of <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 in arterial blood was slower than that of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 (the percentages of nonmetabolized parent in plasma at 90 min were 74.9% ± 4.15% [mean ± SD] and 11.2% ± 1.90%, respectively). The plasma free fractions were similar for both tracers: 3.5% ± 1.1% for <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 and 4.1% ± 1.1% for <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28. The average total volume of distribution (<i>V</i><sub>T</sub>) of <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 (0.15 ± 0.03 mL/cm<sup>3</sup> for <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 and 3.27 ± 0.66 mL/cm<sup>3</sup> for <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28). <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 was characterized by poor transfer from the vascular compartment to the brain (its plasma-to-tissue rate constant [K<sub>1</sub>] was about 10 times smaller than that of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28). Moreover, kinetic modeling was more difficult with <sup>18</sup>F-GE180, as its <i>V</i><sub>T</sub> values were identified with a lower precision than those of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 and outlying values were more frequent. <b>Conclusion:</b> The <i>V</i><sub>T</sub> of <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 because of low penetration into the brain from the vascular compartment. In addition, kinetic modeling of <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 was more challenging than that of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28. Therefore, compared with <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28, <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 had unfavorable characteristics for TSPO imaging of the brain.

Medical subject headings